Writ petition withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to pursue appropriate proceedings before a competent court; interim orders vacated and pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 3701 of 2024
Date of Decision: 9.12.2024
_____________________________________________________________________ Bholeshwar Singh ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors.
……...Petitioner Versus …....Respondents
Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for the State. Mr. Peeyush Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Lalit Sehgal, Advocate, for respondent No.6.
Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings before appropriate court of law.
December 9, 2024 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge
Bholeshwar Singh
State of Himachal Pradesh
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
