Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to make representation to the competent authority; prayer allowed and petition dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the petition with liberty to make representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 1848 of 2024 Date of decision : 2.5.2024. Sarita Kumari ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others ...Respondents. Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge .
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner : Mr. Surinder Kumar Saklani, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Amandeep Sharma, Addl. A.G., for respondents No. 1 to 3.
Mr. Piyush Dhanotia, Advocate for respondent No.4.
Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral):
Learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty to make representation to the competent authority. Prayer being innocuous is allowed. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, reserving liberty as aforesaid. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(Satyen Vaidya) 2nd May 2024 Judge (kck)
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
-2-
Sarita Kumari
State of H.P.
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
