The petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the court upon the advice of counsel for the petitioner. No substantive legal issues were decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No. 1113 of 2022 Decided on 20th November 2024
Sh. Babar Ali and another
…Petitioners
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and others
…Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge
1Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioners: Ms. Babita Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Rajpal Thakur, Additional Advocate General.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral )
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in light
of subsequent development, the petitioner be permitted to withdraw
the petition.
also pending miscellaneous applications, if any.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge
November 20, 2024 (Vinod)
Babar Ali
State of Himachal Pradesh
Ajay Mohan Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
