Proceedings closed with liberty to approach appropriate court for any other subsisting grievance.
liberty granted to petitioner to approach court for any other subsisting grievance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Lalita Kumari & Ors. Vs. State of H.P. & Anr.
CWP No. 1367 of 2022
19.11.2024 Present: Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
as per his instructions, the order has been complied with but he submits that the petitioner be granted liberty that in
case, there is some other subsisting grievance, then he may have recourse to such remedy as may be available in
law. Proceedings are closed accordingly.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge
November 19, 2024 ( Shamsh Tabrez )
Lalita Kumari & Ors.
State of H.P.
Mukul Sood
Pushpinder Jaswal
Ajay Mohan Goel
Shamsh Tabrez
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
