Writ petition challenging a transfer order became infructuous after instructions showed the impugned transfer order had been cancelled; the court disposed of the petition and pending miscellaneous applications.
Petition disposed of as infructuous following cancellation of the challenged transfer order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 1008 of 2024
Decided on: 09.04.2024
Parmod. .…Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and Anr. …Respondents. Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
| For the petitioner | : | Ms. Anuja Mehta, Advocate, vice |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate. | ||
| For the respondents | : | Mr. Amandeep Sharma, |
| Additional Advocate General. |
Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral)
Instructions dated 15.03.2024 have been
placed on record, according to which, the order of transfer challenged in the instant petition has been cancelled.
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
disposed of.
(Satyen Vaidya) 9th April, 2024 Judge (sushma)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging a transfer order survives after the State cancelled the impugned order.
Parmod
State of H.P.
Anr.
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
