Petitioner applied for bail relying on parity with a co-accused who had been granted pre-arrest bail in a previous petition heard by the same court.
The bail petition is allowed; the order dated 08.01.2023 is made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mithilesh Saini Vs. State of H.P.
Cr.MP(M) No. 84 of 2024
20.04.2024 Present: Mr. N.S. Chandel, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Baldev Negi, Additional Advocate General for the respondent/State.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has placed on record a downloaded copy of the order dated 29.2.2024, passed in Cr.MP(M) No. 83 of 2024 titled as Sanjeev Saini vs State of H.P. vide which coaccused, Sanjeev Saini, was enlarged on pre-arrest bail.
In view of this and keeping in view the principle of parity, the present petition is allowed and order dated 08.01.2023 is made absolute.
The petition stands disposed of.
(Rakesh Kainthla) Judge
April 2o, 2024 (ravinder)
Mithilesh Saini
State of H.P.
Rakesh Kainthla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
