In Cr.MP(M) No.65 of 2024, the Single Judge granted the petitioner's application to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr.MP(M) No.65 of 2024 Date of Decision: 20.04.2024
Rakesh Kumar
....Petitioner Versus
State of H.P.
....Respondent
Coram
Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting . No
For the petitioner : Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate, vice Mr. Bhupinder Singh Ahuja. For the respondent: Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy State Advocate General.
Rakesh Kainthla,Judge(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner, under
instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition. Permission granted.
In view of above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Ordered accordingly.
(Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 20th April, 2024. (ravinder)
Rakesh Kumar
State of H.P.
Rakesh Kainthla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
