Appeal disposed of as having become infructuous because the appellant had already undergone the sentence ordered by the lower court. Pending applications also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr. Appeal No.281 of 2018 Date of Decision: 04.09.2024
Jitender Singh @ Ashu ……...Appellant Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?
For the Appellant: Mr. D.N. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General.
____________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel representing the petitioner fairly states that present appeal has rendered infructuous on account of the fact that petitioner has already undergone the sentence imposed by the learned trial Court.
September 04, 2024 (Sandeep Sharma), (Rajeev Raturi) Judge
Jitender Singh @ Ashu
State of Himachal Pradesh
Sandeep Sharma
Rajeev Raturi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
