A criminal miscellaneous petition was withdrawn by the petitioner at counsel's request, and the court dismissed it as withdrawn along with any pending miscellaneous applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr. MP(M) No. 1578 of 2024 Date of Decision : 11.9.2024
Baljeet ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. ....Respondent
Coram
Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No.
For the petitioner : Mr. Hitender Verma, Advocate, vice Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Prashant Sen, Deputy Advocate General.
Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral)
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, under instructions, submits that he wants to withdraw the present petition. Permission granted. Hence, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, so also the pending miscellaneous
application(s), if any.
(Rakesh Kainthla) Judge
11th September, 2024 (Chander)
Baljeet
State of H.P.
Rakesh Kainthla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
