Petitioner sought withdrawal of the criminal miscellaneous petition. Court granted withdrawal with liberty to approach the Trial Court and dismissed the petition.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to approach the learned Trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr. MP(M) No. 1268 of 2024 Date of Decision : 11.9.2024
Satveer ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. ....Respondent
Coram
Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No.
For the petitioner : Mr. Manoj Pathak, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Prashant Sen, Deputy Advocate General.
Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, submits that he wants to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the learned Trial Court. Permission granted. Hence, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to approach the learned Trial Court. The pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand(s) disposed of.
(Rakesh Kainthla) Judge
11th September, 2024 (Chander)
Satveer
State of H.P.
Rakesh Kainthla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
