Disposed¶11

Dharampal Singh v. State of Hp and Others

Himachal Pradesh HC6 Aug 2024CRMMO/248/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Quashing of FIR; cancellation report by Investigating Agency accepted under order dated 12.02.2024 of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.3, Shimla; petition disposed of as infructuous; SP Shimla communication dated 27.06.2024; petitioner Dharampal Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh & others; Cr.MMO No. 248 of 2024; High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla; Justice Sandeep Sharma (oral judgment); decided 06.08.2024; no statute or precedent cited.

What did the court decide?

Since the cancellation report filed in the FIR sought to be quashed has already been accepted and the FIR stands cancelled, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present petition. ¶11

Dharampal Singh Vs State of Hp and Others — Himachal Pradesh HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA

¶2

Cr.MMO No. 248 of 2024 Date of Decision:06.08.2024

¶3

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dharampal Singh ...Petitioners

¶4

Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others …Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?¹ . ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------For the Petitioners: Mr. Rajat Awasthy, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondent-State.

¶5

Ms. Ananya Kiran Sharma, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 2 and 3.

¶6

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)

¶7

While placing on record communication dated 27.06.2024, issued under the signatures of Superintendent of Police, Shimla, District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, learned Additional Advocate General, states that present petition has been rendered infructuous because cancellation report, having been filed by the Investigating Agency in the FIR, sought to be quashed, has been accepted by learned Additional Chief Judicial

¶8

Magistrate, Court No.3, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh.

¶9

1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶10

¶11

Having perused aforesaid communication as well as order dated 12.02.2024 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.3, Shimla, this Court finds that cancellation report filed in the FIR, sought to be quashed, has been already accepted. Since FIR, sought to be quashed, has already been cancelled, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present petition and accordingly, same is disposed of as having rendered infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

¶12

(Sandeep Sharma) Judge

¶13

August 06, 2024

¶14

(shankar)

Dharampal Singh v. State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dharampal Singh v. State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammad Faisal Vs State of Hp and Others

Krishan Dutt Vs Kundan Singh Diwan and another

Roshan Lal Vs Ashwani Sharma

Dhanpat Vs Smt Bansla Alias Bandana Kumari

Satya Devi Vs Jarman Singh

Gian Bhaik Vs Satish Mehta