Dismissed

Mohammad Faisal v. State of Hp and Others

Himachal Pradesh HC5 Aug 2024CRMMO/270/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous petition after he appeared in court following a request from the police officer. The court allowed withdrawal with liberty to file appropriate proceedings later if required.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file appropriate proceeding at appropriate stage.

Mohammad Faisal Vs State of Hp and Others — Bail and Remand | Himachal Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

2024:HHC:6342

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶3

Cr.MMO No.270 of 2021 Date of Decision: 05.08.2024

¶4

_______________________________________________________ Mohammad Faisal

¶5

…….Petitioner

¶6

Versus Sate of HP & Ors. … Respondents

¶7

Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?¹

¶8

For the Petitioner:	Mr. Shikha Rajta and Ms. Aditi Rana, Advocates.
For the Respondents:	Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Vishal Panwar, Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocate Generals, and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No.1-State.
	ASI Ram Singh, PS Manali, District Kullu, HP, present in person.
___________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judg	____________________________________ e (oral):

¶9

Pursuant to order dated 11.06.2024, ASI Ram Singh has

¶10

caused the presence of the petitioner, who states that on account of mis-communication, he was unable to put in appearance before this Court. He states that he was neither informed by his counsel with

¶11

regard to listing of the matter nor factum with regard to listing of the same came to his knowledge. Police official telephoned him and called upon him to come present before this Court on 05.08.2024. Be

¶12

1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶13

¶14

2024:HHC:6342

¶15

that as it may, Ms. Shikha Rajta, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions of the petitioner, who is present in Court, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition at this stage with liberty to file appropriate proceeding at appropriate stage, if so required and

¶16

desired. Ordered accordingly.

¶17

(Sandeep Sharma), Judge

¶18

August 05, 2024 (sunil)

Mohammad Faisal v. State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammad Faisal v. State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Atul Shukla Vs Som Kumar

Ashish Sharma Vs State of Hp

Shankar Singh Vs State of Hp and Another

Krishan Dutt Vs Kundan Singh Diwan and another

Roshan Lal Vs Ashwani Sharma

State of Hp Vs Milap Chand