This petition was dismissed as infructuous because the State filed a communication verifying that the underlying criminal cases had been withdrawn by the Deputy Commissioner of Chamba district.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr.MMO No. 168 of 2020 Date of Decision: 04.09.2024
Vishal Anand
....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors
....Respondents
Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting. No.
| For the petitioner | : Ms. |
Pallavi Sharma, Advocate. |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondents/State | : Mr. Adv |
Jitender Sharma, Additional ocate General |
Rakesh Kainthla,Judge(Oral)
Learned Additional Advocate General for the respondents/State has placed on record a communication issued under the signautures of Superintendent of Police, District Chamba, Himachal Pradesh annexing therewith an
order passed by Deputy Commissioner, District Chamba, Himachal Pradesh on 18.09.2023, ordering for withdrawl of
the cases arising out of the FIR Nos. 39 of 2020, dated
12.04.2020 & 44 of 2020, dated 22.01.2020. Hence, the
present petition has become infructuous.
2
as having become infructuous. Pending application(s), if
any, also stands disposed of.
(Rakesh Kainthla) Judge
04th September, 2024. (Shamsh Tabrez)
Vishal Anand
State of H.P.
Rakesh Kainthla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
