Kush Kumar v. Reenu Sharma
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA…
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr.Revision No. 701 of 2022 Date of Decision : 04.09.2024
| Kush Kumar | ....Petitioner | |
|---|---|---|
| Versus | ||
| Reenu Sharma | ....Respondent |
Coram
Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No
| For the petitioner | : Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjeev K. Suri, Advocate. |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocate |
Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral)
The application, as directed vide order dated 24.07.2024 has not been filed. Hence, the present petition is dismissed as not maintainable. The pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of.
(Rakesh Kainthla) Judge
4th September, 2024 (Nikita)
Kush Kumar
Reenu Sharma
Rakesh Kainthla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court