The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the present petition as not pressed, directing the petitioners to approach the Trial Court for redressal of grievances. Pending applications were also disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr.MMO No. 1077 of 2023
Date of Decision : 12.09.2024
Praveen Kumar & others
....Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. & others.
....Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No
For the petitioners : Mr. K.S.Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr.Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General for respondent No. 1. Mr. Jagmohan Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Rakesh Kainthla,Judge (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners under instructions submits that he does not wants to press the present petition at this stage and he will approach the learned Trial Court for filing an appropriate application.
2
Trial Court for redressal of their grievances. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.
(Rakesh Kainthla) Judge
12th September,2024
(ravinder)
Praveen Kumar & others
State of H.P. & others
Rakesh Kainthla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
