Harpriya Manhas v. State of Hp
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought withdrawal of ten criminal miscellaneous petitions; permission granted and interim orders, if any, vacated.
Petitioner sought withdrawal of ten criminal miscellaneous petitions; permission granted and interim orders, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:HHC:7825
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
| C | r.MMO No. 1090 of 2023 a/w | |
|---|---|---|
| Cr.MMO No.1034, | 1069,10 | 70,1071,1091 to 1095 of 2023 Date of Decision: 03.09.2024 |
| _______________________ 1.Cr.MMO No. 1090 of 2023 Mrs. Harpriya Manhas |
_______ |
_______________________ ...Petitioner |
| State of Himachal Pradesh | Versus | …Respondent |
| _______________________ 2.Cr.MMO No. 1034 of 2023 Mrs. Harpriya Manhas |
_______ Versus |
_______________________ ...Petitioner |
| State of Himachal Pradesh | …Respondent | |
| 3.Cr.MMO No. 1069 of 2023 Mrs. Harpriya Manhas |
Versus |
...Petitioner |
| State of Himachal Pradesh | …Respondent | |
| 4.Cr.MMO No. 1070 of 2023 Mrs. Harpriya Manhas |
Versus |
...Petitioner |
| State of Himachal Pradesh | …Respondent | |
| 5.Cr.MMO No. 1071 of 2023 Mrs. Harpriya Manhas |
...Petitioner | |
| Versus | ||
| State of Himachal Pradesh | …Respondent | |
| 6.Cr.MMO No. 1091 of 2023 Mrs. Harpriya Manhas |
...Petitioner | |
| Versus | ||
| State of Himachal Pradesh | …Respondent | |
| 7.Cr.MMO No. 1092 of 2023 | ||
| Mrs. Harpriya Manhas | Versus | ...Petitioner |
| State of Himachal Pradesh | …Respondent |
2024:HHC:7825
2
8.Cr.MMO No. 1093 of 2023 Mrs. Harpriya Manhas ...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …Respondent _____________________________________________________ 9.Cr.MMO No. 1094 of 2023 Mrs. Harpriya Manhas ...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …Respondent _____________________________________________________ 10.Cr.MMO No. 1095 of 2023 Mrs. Harpriya Manhas ...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …Respondent ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 . ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Kashmir Singh Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Learned counsel representing the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present petitions.
(Sandeep Sharma) Judge September 03, 2024 (shankar)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Mrs. Harpriya Manhas
State of Himachal Pradesh
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court