Sushil Kumar v. Srikant Baldi
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court closed the contempt petition upon finding no willful disobedience of the Tribunal's direction. The Department had rejected the representation, thereby complying with the order to decide it. The petitioner was left with liberty to approach the appropriate forum.
What did the court decide?
Notice discharged; proceedings closed with liberty to approach appropriate forum.
What the court decided
2024:HHC:6464
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT
SHIMLA
COPCT No. 456 of 2020 Decided on : 05.08.2024
Sushil Kumar
…Petitioner
Versus
Sh. Srikant Baldi and others.
…Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner : Ms. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Dhananjay, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rupinder Singh Thakur, Additional Advocate General.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there was willful disobedience of the Tribunal's direction for decision of the representation for compassionate appointment?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sushil Kumar
- respondent
Sh. Srikant Baldi and others
Coram
Ajay Mohan Goel
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- COPCT/456/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court