Petitioner sought withdrawal of the petition with liberty to pursue remedies in accordance with law; the court granted permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn with pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CMPMO No. 370 of 2024 Decided on: 08.07.2024
____________________________________________________ M/s Palam Gas Service through its proprietor ……….. petitioner Versus State of H.P. and another respondents ____________________________________________________ Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Dushyant Dadwal, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General. ____________________________________________________ Bipin Chander Negi, Judge ( oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission
to withdraw the instant petition reserving liberty to avail the
remedy available in accordance with law. Permission granted.
(Bipin Chander Negi) Judge
July 08, 2024 tarun
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
M/s Palam Gas Service through its proprietor
State of H.P.
Bipin Chander Negi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
