The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the CMPMO petition as withdrawn by the petitioner on 06.09.2024 and vacated an interim order dated 12.07.2018.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; Interim order dated 12.07.2018 vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CMPMO No.272 of 2018
Decided on: 6th September, 2024
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajinder Kumar …..Petitioner
Versus
Padam Singh (deceased) through LRs and others
.....Respondents
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner: Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Ajay Chandel, Advocate vice Mr. N.S. Shandil, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 9, 11 and 12. Respondent No.10 stands deleted.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
After arguing for a considerable period, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn alongwith pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Interim order dated 12.07.2018 is vacated
forthwith. Parties, through their learned counsel, are
1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes
2
directed to appear before the learned Trial Court on
25.09.2024.
September 06, 2024 Mukesh
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge
Rajinder Kumar
Padam Singh (deceased) through LRs and others
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
