In a compliance check regarding Ex. Petition No.119/2024 and CMP No.8751/2024, the high court was informed that the impugned judgment was complied with and pension was sanctioned. The court held the application unnecessary and disposed of it.
The application was disposed of as the underlying judgment had been complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chinta Devi Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
Ex. Pet. No.119 of 2024
Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta and Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Sanjay Dutt Vasudeva, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 4-State.
Mr. Tara Chand Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.5.
CMP No.8751 of 2024
Learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner submits that the judgment in question now stands duly complied with. The amount has been released in favour of the applicant/petitioner.
In terms of the reply filed by respondent No.5 to the application, pension has also been duly sanctioned in favour of the applicant/petitioner.
In view of the above, learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner does not wish to press this application.
Accordingly, the application is disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua September 16, 2024 Judge Mukesh
Chinta Devi
State of H.P.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
