Listed matter; additional time granted for filing reply; separate application for early hearing was not entertained and dismissed pending complete pleadings.
Adjustment given to file reply before the next date; application for early hearing stayed till pleadings are complete.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Kamla Devi vs. HRTC & Anr.
CWP - 8950 of 2022
10.05.2024 Present : Mr. R.S. Gautam, Advocate, for the petitioner/applicant.
Mr. Arun, Advocate, vice counsel for the respondents.
CMP-6268 of 2024
No order can be passed in the application for
early hearing, at this stage, as the pleadings are not complete yet. Respondents have not filed their reply till date. Thus, the application stands dismissed.
CWP - 8950 of 2022
More time sought to file reply. Be filed on or
before next date.
List on 14.06.2024.
(Satyen Vaidya) Judge
10th May, 2024 (Pardeep)
Kamla Devi
HRTC & Anr.
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
