Petitioner's suspension-confirmation writ petition dismissed as infructuous due to expiry of suspension order via office order.
Petition disposed of as infructuous; pending applications also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 3060 of 2024
Date of decision : 9.5.2024.
Rajeev Kumar ...Petitioner.
Versus
State of H.P. & others ...Respondents. Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge .
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner : Mr. Sudhir Thakur, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Karun Negi, Advocate.
For the respondents : Ms. Avni Kochher, DAG.
Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral):
Instructions have been placed on record along with office order whereby the suspension of the petitioner has been ordered to be revoked. In view of this development, the subject matter of the instant petition has been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of having been rendered infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Rajeev Kumar
State of H.P.
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
