Anuradha Thakur v. State of Hp
Case brief
What is this about?
Application seeking expedition of hearing allowed; main service writ petition adjourned for four weeks to enable the State to obtain complete instructions, to be listed again.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Dr. Anuradha Thakur vs. State of H.P. and others
CWPOA No.3621 of 2019
04.07.2024 Present: Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Tejasvi Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents-State.
CMP-T No. 475 of 2024
Considering the contents of the application, the same is allowed and hearing of the case is ordered to be expedited. Application stands disposed of.
CWPOA No. 3621 of 2019
Learned Additional Advocate General
sought time to have complete instructions. Needful be done within a period of four weeks.
List on 21.08.2024.
(Virender Singh) Judge
July 04, 2024 (veena)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Dr. Anuradha Thakur
- respondent
State of H.P.
Coram
Virender Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CMP-T/475/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court