Order in Criminal Miscellaneous Petition by Special Leave. The court condoned the condonation of delay application and disposed of an application deemed infructuous after hearing submissions.
Condonation of delay allowed; infructuous application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Vinod Kumar Vs. State of H.P. & others.
CMP (M) No. 1693 of 2024
10.12.2024 Present : Mr.Kishore Pundeer, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Ramakant Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 3-State.
None for respondent No. 4.
CMP (M) No. 1693 of 2024
Despite service there is no representation on behalf of respondent No. 4, hence, he is proceeded against ex parte.
Though, reply to the application was not filed, however, prayer for condonation of delay has been opposed vehemently by learned Additional Advocate General.
After going through the pleadings in the application and considering the submissions on behalf of both parties, delay in filing the appeal is condoned.
The application is allowed and disposed of.
LPA No. …… of 2024 (LPAST No. 40933 of 2024
Appeal be registered.
Notice. Mr.Ramakant Sharma, Additional Advocate
General waives service and accepts notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 3.
Notice to respondent No. 4, on taking steps within two days, returnable on next date of hearing, be issued.
List for consideration on 7th January, 2025 .
CMP No. … of 2024 (CMPST No. 43842 of 2024)
Be Registered. As certified copy of impugned
judgment/order dated 30.8.2024 has already been filed, therefore, this application has become infructuous and disposed of accordingly.
(Vivek Singh Thakur), Judge.
(Rakesh Kainthla), Judge.
10th December, 2024.
(Keshav)
Vinod Kumar
State of H.P.
others
Vivek Singh Thakur
Rakesh Kainthla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
