Application seeking condonation of a nine-day delay in filing an appeal was granted after the court found sufficient cause; delay in re-filing after removing objections also condoned. Appeal to be registered and listed for consideration.
Nine-day delay in filing the appeal condoned; application disposed of; appeal ordered registered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sunita Verma vs. HPTDCL
07.11.2024 Present:
CMP(M) No.1513 of 2024 Mr.Sohail Khan, Advocate vice Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Mr. Shivank Singh Panta, Advocate, for the respondent. CMPST No.20747 of 2024
Allowed as prayed for. The delay in re-filing the application after removing the objections is ordered to be condoned.
CMP (M) No.1513 of 2024
By medium of this application, the applicant has sought condonation of 9 days delay that has crept-up in filing of the appeal. A perusal of paragraph 2 of the application discloses sufficient cause which prevented the applicant from filing the appeal within the prescribed period of limitation. Accordingly, the aforesaid delay is condoned. The application stands disposed
of. The appeal be registered.
LPA No._____ of 2024
List for consideration on 11th November, 2024.
( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) Acting Chief Justice
( Satyen Vaidya ) Judge
November 07, 2024 (vt)
Sunita Verma
HPTDCL
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
