Appeal challenging a transfer order; the transfer order having been withdrawn, the appeal was not pressed and dismissed. No substantive adjudication resulted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA LPA No.17 of 2024 Decided on: 06.11.2024
Suresh Kumar Jaswal ...Appellant Versus State of H.P. & another ...Respondents
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Acting Chief Justice Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge Whether approved for reporting?
For the appellant: Mr. B.B. Vaid, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rakesh Dhaulta, Mr.Pranay Pratap Singh, Additional Advocate General, Ms.Priyanka Chauhan & Mr. Sidharth Jalta, Deputy Advocates General, for respondent No.1. Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vipul Shardha, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Acting Chief Justice (Oral)
Since the order of transfer challenged before the writ Court has now been withdrawn, learned counsel for the appellant states that he is under instructions not to press the present appeal. Consequently, the same is dismissed as not pressed
( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) Acting Chief Justice
( Satyen Vaidya ) Judge
November 06, 2024 (vt)
Suresh Kumar Jaswal
State of H.P.
another
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
