Allowed¶8

State v. Bishan Singh

Himachal Pradesh HC4 Jul 2024CMP/10206/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Release of enhanced compensation with proportionate interest; CMP Nos.10206-10214 of 2024 allowed; RFA No.8 of 2012; no further appeal before Hon'ble Apex Court; remittance to claimants' bank accounts; verification of identity; State of HP v. Bishan Singh; shares of claimants; paper book pages 209/219/336; Additional Advocate General B.N. Sharma; Advocate N.K. Bhalla.

What did the court decide?

Release of the enhanced amount of compensation along with proportionate interest to each applicant-claimant as per her/his share (details at Pages 209/219/336 of the paper book), to be remitted to the bank account stated in Paragraph-2 of the application, subject to proper verification of identity; applications stand disposed of. ¶8

State Vs Bishan Singh — Himachal Pradesh HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶8

Issue for consideration

Whether the claimant-applicants' applications (CMP Nos.10206 to 10214 of 2024) deserve to be allowed so that the enhanced amount of compensation along with proportionate interest is released to each applicant as per her/his share.

¶8

Court's answer

Each application (CMP Nos.10206 to 10214 of 2024) is allowed: the enhanced amount of compensation along with proportionate interest is ordered to be released in favour of the respective applicant as per her/his share, to be remitted to the bank account given in Paragraph-2 of the application, subject to proper verification of identity.

¶8

Ratio / Principle

The court proceeded on the footing that no further appeal had been preferred before the Hon'ble Apex Court against the judgment in RFA No.8 of 2012.

¶7

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Order of a Single Judge (Bipin C. Negi, J.) dated 04.07.2024 allowing CMP Nos.10206 to 10214 of 2024 filed by the claimants in State of HP and others v. Bishan Singh and others (RFA No.8 of 2012, stated as decided on 03.12.2013 in ¶7 and as 03.12.2023 in subsequent paragraphs). Recording that no further appeal had been preferred before the Hon'ble Apex Court against the RFA judgment, the court directed release of the enhanced amount of compensation along with proportionate interest to each applicant as per her/his share (details at Pages 209/219/336 of the paper book), remittance to the bank accounts given in Paragraph-2 of the applications, subject to proper verification of identity. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, appeared for the petitioners/State; N.K. Bhalla, Advocate, for the applicants-claimants. Each application stands disposed of.

¶1

State of HP and others vs. Bishan Singh and others

¶2

RFA No.8 of 2012

¶3

04.07.2024 Present:

¶4

Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the petitioners/State. Mr. N.K. Bhalla, Advocate, for the applicants-claimants.

¶5

CMP No.10206/2024

¶6

No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the nonapplicants/appellants.

¶7

RFA No.8 of 2012, in the case at hand, was decided on 03.12.2013, but no further appeal has been preferred against the said judgment before the Hon’ble Apex Court.

¶8

On account of the aforesaid and for the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The enhanced amount of compensation along with proportionate interest is ordered to be released in favour of the applicant, as per her share, details whereof, have been given at Page No.209/219/336 of the paper book. The amount be remitted to the bank account, details whereof, have been given in Paragraph-2 of the application, subject to proper verification of her identity. Application stands disposed of.

¶9

CMP No.10208/2024

¶10

No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the nonapplicants/appellants.

¶11

RFA No.8 of 2012 in the case at hand was decided on 03.12.2023, but no further appeal has been preferred against the said judgment before the Hon’ble Apex Court.

¶12

¶13

-2-

¶14

amount be remitted to the bank account, details whereof, have been given in Paragraph-2 of the application, subject to proper verification of her identity. Application stands disposed of.

¶15

CMP No.10209/2024

¶16

No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the nonapplicants/appellants.

¶17

RFA No.8 of 2012 in the case at hand was decided on 03.12.2023, but no further appeal has been preferred against the said judgment before the Hon’ble Apex Court.

¶18

On account of the aforesaid and for the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The enhanced amount of compensation along with proportionate interest is ordered to be released in favour of the applicant, as per his share, details whereof, have been given at Page No.209/219/336 of the paper book. The amount be remitted to the bank account, details whereof, have been given in Paragraph-2 of the application, subject to proper verification of his identity. Application stands disposed of.

¶19

CMP No.10210/2024

¶20

No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the nonapplicants/appellants.

¶21

RFA No.8 of 2012 in the case at hand was decided on 03.12.2023, but no further appeal has been preferred against the said judgment before the Hon’ble Apex Court.

¶22

¶23

-3-

¶24

amount be remitted to the bank account, details whereof, have been given in Paragraph-2 of the application. Application stands disposed of.

¶25

CMP No.10211/2024

¶26

No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the nonapplicants/appellants.

¶27

RFA No.8 of 2012 in the case at hand was decided on 03.12.2023, but no further appeal has been preferred against the said judgment before the Hon’ble Apex Court.

¶28

On account of the aforesaid and for the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The enhanced amount of compensation along with proportionate interest is ordered to be released in favour of the applicant, as per his share, details whereof, have been given at Page No.209/219/336 of the paper book. The amount be remitted to the bank account, details whereof, have been given in Paragraph-2 of the application, subject to proper verification of his identity. Application stands disposed of.

¶29

CMP No.10212/2024

¶30

No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the nonapplicants/appellants.

¶31

RFA No.8 of 2012 in the case at hand was decided on 03.12.2023, but no further appeal has been preferred against the said judgment before the Hon’ble Apex Court.

¶32

¶33

-4-

¶34

amount be remitted to the bank account, details whereof, have been given in Paragraph-2 of the application, subject to proper verification of his identity. Application stands disposed of.

¶35

CMP No.10213/2024

¶36

No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the nonapplicants/appellants.

¶37

RFA No.8 of 2012 in the case at hand was decided on 03.12.2023, but no further appeal has been preferred against the said judgment before the Hon’ble Apex Court.

¶38

On account of the aforesaid and for the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The enhanced amount of compensation along with proportionate interest is ordered to be released in favour of the applicant, as per his share, details whereof, have been given at Page No.209/219/336 of the paper book. The amount be remitted to the bank account, details whereof, have been given in Paragraph-2 of the application, subject to proper verification of his identity. Application stands disposed of.

¶39

CMP No.10214/2024

¶40

No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the nonapplicants/appellants.

¶41

RFA No.8 of 2012 in the case at hand was decided on 03.12.2023, but no further appeal has been preferred against the said judgment before the Hon’ble Apex Court.

¶42

¶43

-5-

¶44

amount be remitted to the bank account, details whereof, have been given in Paragraph-2 of the application, subject to proper verification of his identity. Application stands disposed of.

¶45

( Bipin C. Negi ) July 04, 2024 (KS) Judge

State v. Bishan Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

State v. Bishan Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Seema Guleria Vs State of Hp and Others

Devi Singh Vs State of Hp and Others

Randeep Singh Vs State of Hp and Others

Amit Vs Additional Disctrict Magistrate and Others

State Vs Bishan Singh

State Vs Bishan Singh