The court closed contempt proceedings as the underlying writ petition had been reviewed and restored for fresh decision, discharging the notice to the respondent and disposing of pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 2024:HHC:14400 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No. 508/2024 Decided on: 13.12.2024 Kuldeep Singh …Petitioner
Versus
Rohan Chand Thakur .…Respondent.
………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioners: Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Vinod K. Gupta, Advocate.
For the respondent:
Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the decision rendered on 31.05.2023 in CWP No. 2108 of 2023 ( Bhagat Ram vs. HRTC & Ors.) having been reviewed and the aforesaid writ petition having been restored for fresh decision, these contempt proceedings are closed.
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 ( 2024:HHC:14400 )
stage. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand
disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge
13th December, 2024(Shamsh Tabrez)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether contempt proceedings should be continued or closed following the review and restoration of the underlying writ petition.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Bhagat Ram vs. HRTC & Ors.Referred¶10
CWP No. 2108 of 2023 ( Bhagat Ram vs. HRTC & Ors.)
Kuldeep Singh
Rohan Chand Thakur
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
