any cogent material to the contrary on record, this Court is not in a position to hold that the claimant/petitioner was completely disabled from driving the vehicle after the accident. 16. In a result, it is held that the petitioner has suffered 30 percent disability as a result of accident. The age of the petitioner at the time of accident is stated to be 40 years, which fact has also not been denied by the respondent. The claimant claimed to be earning Rs. 10,000/- P.M by plying the aforesaid car. As per his own case, the petitioner was owner-cum-driver of the Alto car(Taxi) bearing No. HP-01S1015. In his affidavit claimant has also stated that income to be Rs. 10,000/- P.M at the time of accident. In his evidence also the claimant has stated his income to be Rs. 10,000/P.M at the time of accident. In his cross examination, no serious attempt has been made to discredit his version about his earning. As noticed above, respondents have not led any evidence. The income of Rs.10,000/- P.M by self employed driver-cum-owner in the year 2011 cannot be said to be excessive. In this view of matter, the monthly income of claimant for the purposes assessment of compensation is taken at Rs. 10,000/-. In the given circumstances, the loss of income on account of the disability suffered by the claimant
