Deva Nand v. Tara Chand and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
In this CMPMO, the Himachal Pradesh High Court observed the impugned order had no illegality but, to avoid delay, allowed the petitioner one final opportunity to lead evidence. The Court set aside the lower order directing evidence recording, burdened the petitioner with costs of Rs. 10,000, and dismissed the challenge to another later order.
What did the court decide?
Impugned order set aside; petitioner allowed one last opportunity to lead evidence; petitioner burdened with costs of Rs. 10,000; petition otherwise dismissed.