No substantive issue arose as the petitioner instructed counsel to drop the matter. The oral order closed the execution petition and disposed of several connected miscellaneous applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition No. 02 of 2021
Decided on: 29.11.2023
| Change Makers Society | .…Petitioner |
|---|---|
| Versus | |
| Amandeep Singh | …Respondent |
| Coram | |
| The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Aja | y Mohan Goel, Judge. |
| Whether approved for repor | ting?1 |
| For the petitioner : | Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate. |
| For the respondent : |
Mr. Aditya Chauhan, Advocate. |
| Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge |
(Oral) |
Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, submits that now the matter stands settled and he has instructions not to press this petition. In view of the submissions of learned Counsel for the petitioner, this execution petition is closed as not pressed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), i.e. OMP No. 738 of 2022, OMP No. 170 of 2023 and OMP No. 276 of 2023, also stand disposed of accordingly.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) November 29, 2023 Judge (narender)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Change Makers Society
Amandeep Singh
Ajay Mohan Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
