The petitioner withdrew a writ petition with liberty to pursue the issue in the appropriate forum before notice was issued to respondents.
Writ petition withdrawn with liberty to pursue the issue in the appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 9513 of 2023 Decided on : 29.11.2023
Neha Sharma and another .…Petitioners Versus Union of India and others …Respondents Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. Vivek Singh Attri, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Balram Sharma, DSGI for respondents No. 1 to 5.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge ( Oral )
Notice. Mr. Balram Sharma, learned Deputy
Solicitor General of India, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 5.
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also
stand disposed of accordingly.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) November 29, 2023 Judge (narender)
Neha Sharma and another
Union of India and others
Ajay Mohan Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
