This dispose order, upon an oral prayer by counsel for the petitioner, grants permission to withdraw the present criminal service petition and dismisses it as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWPOA No.6285 of 2020
Date of Decision: October 3, 2023
Rajesh Kumar
…Petitioner.
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh & others
..Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr.Guna Nand Verma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr.Anup Rattan, Advocate General, alongwith Mr.Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 and 2. None for respondent No.3.
Vivek Singh Thakur, J (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner, under
instructions, seeks permission to withdraw this petition.
(Vivek Singh Thakur), Judge.
(Bipin Chander Negi), Judge.
October 3, 2023
(Purohit)
Rajesh Kumar
State of Himachal Pradesh
Vivek Singh Thakur
Bipin Chander Negi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
