Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to file afresh on the same cause of action. The court granted the prayer and dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh on the same cause of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWPOA No.5456 of 2020
Date of Decision: October 3, 2023
Roshan Lal
…Petitioner.
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh & others
..Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr.Sanjay Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr.Anup Rattan, Advocate General, alongwith Mr.Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General.
Vivek Singh Thakur, J (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner, under
instructions, seeks permission to withdraw this petition, with liberty to file afresh on the same cause of action. 2. In view of above, petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file afresh on the same cause of action as permissible under law. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(Vivek Singh Thakur), Judge.
(Bipin Chander Negi), Judge.
October 3, 2023
(Purohit)
Roshan Lal
State of Himachal Pradesh
Vivek Singh Thakur
Bipin Chander Negi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
