The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed a writ petition as infructuous by its own order. No substantive issues or legal principles were discussed in the brief oral decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWPOA No.5233 of 2020 Decided on: 3rd October, 2023
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Surender Kumar …..Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and another .....Respondents
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice M.S. Ramachandra Rao, Chief Justice.
The Hon’ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rakesh Dhaulta Mr. Pranay Pratap Singh, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Arsh Rattan & Mr. Sidharth Jalta, Deputy Advocates General, for respondent no.1. None for respondent no.2.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ M.S. Ramachandra Rao, Chief Justice (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the writ
petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Pending
1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order?
2
miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of
accordingly.
(M.S. Ramachandra Rao) Chief Justice
October 03, 2023
(Jyotsna Rewal Dua) Judge
Mukesh
Surender Kumar
State of H.P.
another
M.S. Ramachandra Rao
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
