Application for condonation of 40-day delay in filing an appeal allowed. The court noted the additional advocate general had no objection to the condonation of delay.
Delay of 40 days in filing the LPA was condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Dr. Chander Mani Saroch Vs. State of H.P. & Anr.
CMP(M) No.598 of 2023
03.10.2023 Present:
Mr. Rocky, Advocate vice Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rakesh Dhaulta & Pranay Pratap Singh, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Arsh Rattan & Mr. Sidharth Jalta, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondents.
This application is filed to condone the delay of 40 days
in filing the appeal. Learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents on instructions states that he has no objection for the condonation of said period of 40 days. Therefore, this application is allowed and the delay of 40 days in filing the LPA is condoned.
The application stands disposed of.
LPA No. of 2023
Be registered.
Notice. Mr. Sidharth Jalta, learned Deputy Advocate
General, accepts service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
At the request of learned vice counsel appearing for the appellant, list on 21.12.2023.
(M.S. Ramachandra Rao) Chief Justice
(Jyotsna Rewal Dua) October 03, 2023 Judge Mukesh
Dr. Chander Mani Saroch
State of H.P.
Anr.
M.S. Ramachandra Rao
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
