Court on Its Own Motion v. State of Hp and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
This order dismissed a reply regarding application for impleadment in a case concerning JOA library posts. The court noted record-keeping of a letter on rationalization and adjourned the matter without substantive disposal.
What the court decided
Item No. D-3.
Court on its own motion vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
CWPIL No. 32 of 2022.
07.01.2025 Present: Court on its own motion. Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rakesh Dhaulta, Addl. A.G., Mr. Pranay Pratap Singh, Addl. A.G., Ms. Priyanka Chauhan, Dy. A.G. and Mr. Sidharath Jalta, Dy. A.G., for respondents-State. Mr. Abhimanyu Rathore, Advocate, for the applicant in CMP No. 20001 of 2024.
CMP No. 20001 of 2024.
Reply to this application for impleadment has been filed by the State. Copy of the same has been supplied to the learned counsel for the applicant in the Court today.
Learned Advocate General has placed on record letter dated 06.01.2025 showing the difficulties to ascertain that how may posts of JOA (library) are required and how many needs to be abolished since the rationalization/restructuring of schools is under way. The same is taken on record.
To come up for consideration on 18th March, 2025. Name of Mr. Abhimanyu Rathore, Advocate be reflected in the cause list.
( G. S. Sandhawalia ) Chief Justice.
Parties & counsel
- respondent
State of H.P. & Ors.
- applicant
Abhimanyu Rathore
Coram
G. S. Sandhawalia
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWPIL/32/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court