Ranjha Ram v. the State of Hp and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
In this CWP, the court observed that the petitioner's temporary deployment at Palampur was inexplicable given his eligibility for a permanent posting due to 17 years of tribal-area service. The respondent-State was directed to ensure the petitioner's accommodation at Palampur till retirement.
What did the court decide?
Respondents directed to ensure the petitioner is accommodated at Palampur till his retirement.