This court disposed of a pension-related writ petition as infructuous after the respondent confirmed that all admissible retiral dues were paid.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWP No. 512 of 2023 Decided on: 3rd March, 2023
Kaushalya Devi .......Petitioner Versus State of H.P and others ...Respondents
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dogra, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G with Mr. I.N. Mehta and Mr. Y.W. Chauhan, Sr. Addl. A.Gs. for respondents No. 1 to 4. Mr. Tara Chand Chauhan, Advocate for respondent No.5.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. (Oral)
Learned Deputy Advocate General has placed on record instructions dated 2nd March, 2023 which goes to indicate that the entire retiral dues, as admissible to the petitioner have been paid.
1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
2
she is at liberty to avail of such remedy as is available to her in accordance with law, including reviving the instant petition. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) Judge March 03, 2023 ( Virender Singh ) (naveen) Judge
Kaushalya Devi
State of H.P
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Virender Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
