Petitioner in CWP No.6027 of 2023 submitted that he is under instructions to withdraw the writ petition intending to seek adjustment from the competent authority. The High Court dismissed the petition accordingly.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No.6027 of 2023
Decided on: 4th September, 2023
_________________________________________________________________ Kamal Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors …Respondents ________________________________________________________________ Coram_
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Avinash Jaryal, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rupinder Singh Thakur & Mr. Varun Chandel, Additional Advocates General, Ms. Seema Sharma, Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for
the petitioner submitted that he is under instructions to withdraw the present writ petition as the petitioner intends to represent to the competent authority, for his adjustment. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also
to stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge
September 4, 2023
R.Atal
Kamal Singh
State of H.P. & Ors
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
