Surinder Mohan Sharma v. Hpu and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought to include Secretariat Pay as part of basic pay for pension. Court directed respondents to decide the case in light of Durga Ram judgment within six weeks.
Petitioner sought to include Secretariat Pay as part of basic pay for pension. Court directed respondents to decide the case in light of Durga Ram judgment within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 5285/2023 Decided on: 14.08.2023 Surinder Mohan Sharma .…Petitioner
Versus
HPU & Anr. ……Respondents
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner : Mr. Abhinav Purohit, Advocate vice Mr. Rakesh Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Gourav Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Varun Chandel, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.2.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J
Prayer in this petition is to include Secretariat Pay as part
of the Basic Pay for computing pension and other retiral benefits.
that the petitioner would be content, in case, respondents/competent 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
authority are directed to consider and decide the case of the petitioner, in light of the law laid down in the aforesaid judgment, in a time bound manner. Prayer is not opposed by learned counsel for the respondents. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the case of the petitioner in light of the aforesaid judgment and in case, the petitioner is found to be similarly situated then the benefit extended to the petitioners in the aforesaid judgment, shall also be extended to the petitioner in the instant cases also. The entire exercise be completed within six weeks from today.
The instant petition is disposed of, in above terms, so also the pending application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge
14th August, 2023 (Rohit)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Durga Ram Vs. Himachal Pradesh University & Anr.Referred¶12
CWPOA No. 208/2020 (Durga Ram Vs. Himachal Pradesh University & Anr.)
Surinder Mohan Sharma
Himachal Pradesh University
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court