Petitioner challenged a transfer order regarding GHS services. The impugned order was withdrawn by the respondents before the hearing, rendering the writ petition moot.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No.4793 of 2023 Decided on: 14th August, 2023 _________________________________________________________________ Nisha Devi ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors …Respondents ________________________________________________________________ Coram_ Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Abhinav Purohit, Advocate vice Mr. Desh Raj Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Y. P. S. Dhaulta & Mr. Varun Cahndel, Additional Advocates General, Ms.Seema Sharma Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for respondents No. 1 to 3..
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Learned Law Officer has placed on record a copy of instructions memo dated nil of August 2023, indicating that transfer order dated 20.07.2023, impugned in the present petition, has been withdrawn vide office order dated 27.07.2023. A copy of office order dated 27.07.2023,
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
withdrawing transfer order of the petitioner from GGHS Dadahu to GHS Barol u/c Karog, has also been placed on
record alongwith the instructions memo.
2. Since the relief prayed for by the petitioner now stands granted to him, the present writ petition to stand disposed of accordingly.
The pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge
August 14, 2023
R.Atal
Nisha Devi
State of H.P.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
