Petitioner sought permission to withdraw a constitutional petition. The High Court allowed the request and dismissed the petition as withdrawn along with pending applications.
Permission to withdraw the petition was allowed; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWP No. 832 of 2023 Decided on: 02.03.2023
Sanjeev Kumar …Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1No.
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents : Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr. I. N. Mehta, Mr. Y. W. Chauhan, Sr. Addl. A.Gs. and Mr. J. S. Guleria, Dy. A.G.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition. Prayer being innocuous is allowed.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
2nd March, 2023 (sanjeev)
(Virender Singh) Judge
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes
Sanjeev Kumar
State of H.P.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Virender Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
