Disposed

Vidya Singh Negi and Others v. the State of Hp and Others

Himachal Pradesh HC8 Sept 2023CWP/3407/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking direction for promotion of petitioners as Principals in the ST category. Court disposed of the petition by directing the competent authority to decide representatives within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondent No.1 to decide representations of petitioners (Annexure P-4) within four weeks and communicate the decision.

Vidya Singh Negi and Others Vs the… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Himachal Pradesh HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶2

CWP No.3407 of 2023

¶3

Decided on: 8^th September, 2023

¶4

Vidya Singh Negi and others …..Petitioners

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of H.P. and others .....Respondents

¶7

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Coram

¶8

Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

¶9

Whether approved for reporting?¹

¶10

For the Petitioners: Ms. Shashi Kiran Negi, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Varun Chandel, Additional Advocate General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer.

¶11

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

¶12

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge

¶13

This writ petition has been filed by the

¶14

petitioners for the grant of following substantive relief:-

¶15

“a) That a writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued directing the respondents to promote the petitioners as Principals (School Cadre) from the date when some of the Lecturers had foregone their promotions/placements and vacancies fall vacant in the category of Schedule Tribes with all consequential benefits as still there are 14 posts of Principals (School Cadre) are lying vacant in the ST category in different schools.”

¶16

2. The respondents have not filed reply to the writ

¶17

petition as yet, however, learned counsel for the petitioners

¶18

1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.

¶19

¶20

submits that the petitioners would be satisfied in case respondent No.1/competent authority is directed to decide the representations preferred by the petitioners, placed on record as Annexure P-4 (Colly.), within a time-bound schedule.

¶21

3. In view of the above submissions, this writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent No.1/ competent authority to decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners (Annexure P-4 Colly.) in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners.

¶22

The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.

¶23

Jyotsna Rewal Dua September 08, 2023 Judge Mukesh

Vidya Singh Negi and Others v. the State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vidya Singh Negi and Others v. the State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tek Chand and Others Vs the State of Hp and Others

Pardeep Chadha Vs State of Hp and Others

Gulshan Sharma and Others Vs the State of Hp and Others

Basant Singh Vs State of Hp and Others

Amin Chand and Others Vs Hrtc and Another

Som Dutt Vs Hpsebl and Others