Petitioners sought mandamus for minimum revised pay scale benefits. Reliance was placed upon a prior judgment and a government memo indicating arrears would be released after final outcome of a linked appeal.
Direct respondents to do the needful in terms of their submissions within the indicated time-line.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 3874/2023 Decided on: 06.09.2023 Tek Chand & Ors. .…Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors. ……Respondents
………………………………………………………………………………… Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioners : Mr. R.L. Chaudhary, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate Genera with Ms. Seema Sharma, Deputy Advocate General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J
This writ petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive relief:-
“i. That writ of mandamus may kindly be issued, directing the respondent authorities to extend the benefit of minimum of the revised pay scale i.e. Rs.10300-34800/- w.e.f. 01.04.2007 to 31.03.2010 to the petitioners with all consequential benefits, in light of the ratio laid down by this Hon’ble Court in terms of Annexure P-1 i.e. judgment dated 29.06.2022 passed by this Hon’ble Court in CWPOA No.7661/2019, titled as Pushap Raj Khimta & Others Vs. State of H.P. & others and in terms of Annexure P-2 i.e. judgment dated 21.04.2023 passed by this Hon’ble Court in Execution Petition No. 150/2022.”
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes
2
In view of instructions dated 05.09.2023, the order dated 30.08.2023 appended with the instructions and the submissions so made by learned Deputy Advocate General, the present petition is disposed of. Respondents are directed to do the needful in terms of
3
their submissions within the indicated time-line. Pending miscellaneous
application(s), if any, also to stand disposed.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge
06th September 2023 (Rohit)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Pushap Raj Khimta & Others Vs. State of H.P. & othersReferred¶11
CWPOA No.7661/2019
CWPOA No.7661/2019Referred¶11
Execution Petition No. 150/2022
Tek Chand & Ors.
State of H.P. & Ors.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
