Petitioner sought withdrawal of a filed petition which was permitted by the single judge court. The judgment dismissed the petition on withdrawal grounds without any substantive legal finding.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr. MP(M) No. 2536 of 2023 Date of Decision : 04th November, 2023.
Udit Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P.
....Respondent
Coram
Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?
: For the petitioner Mr. Harsh Sharol, Advocate vice Mr. Manoj Pathak, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr.Parshant Sen, Deputy State Advocate General.
Rakesh Kainthla,Judge(Oral)
Learend counsel for the petitioner, under
instructions, submits that he wants to withdraw the present petition. Permission granted.
as withdrawn. Ordered accordingly.
(Rakesh Kainthla) Judge
Udit Singh
State of H.P.
Rakesh Kainthla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
