The High Court listed a bail petition where specimen handwriting was examined by SFSL. The court held custodial interrogation unnecessary and made an earlier order absolute.
The order passed on 25.09.2023 was made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Parmjit Singh Vs. State of H.P.
Cr.MP(M) No. 2450 of 2023
02.11.2023 Present:
Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dogra, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate, General for the respondent-State.
HC Kishori Lal No. 43 I/O P.P. City Bilaspur, H.P. Police Station Sadar Bilaspur.
Status report filed and the same is taken on record.
Perusal of the status report shows that specimen handwriting of the accused was taken before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Bilaspur, H.P. and the same has been sent to the SFSL Junga for its examination.
Custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required.
In view of above, order passed on 25.09.2023, is made absolute.
(Rakesh Kainthla) Judge
November 2, 2023
(ravinder)
Parmjit Singh
State of H.P.
Rakesh Kainthla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
