Makhan Deen v. State of Hp
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.…
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CrMP(M) No. 181 of 2023 Decided on: March 7, 2023
| ________________________ Makhan Deen State of Himachal Pradesh |
________________________________ ………..Petitioner Versus ….Respondent |
|---|---|
| _________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Whether approved for reporting _________________________ |
_______________________________ Sharma, Judge. ?1 _______________________________ |
| For the Petitioner : |
Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate. |
For the Respondents : _________________________ |
Mr. Anoop Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol and Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General. ASI Madho Ram, I/O Police Station Nurpur, District Kangra, Himachal Pradesh _______________________________ |
Sandeep Sharma, Judge
Though respondent-State has filed status report, but learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh, at an appropriate stage, if required and desired.
(Sandeep Sharma) Judge March 7, 2023 (vikrant)
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Makhan Deen
State of Himachal Pradesh
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court