On the petitioner s application, permission was granted to withdraw the petition. The high court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr.MMO No. 240 of 2023 Decided on: 10.04.2023 Manoj Kumar .…Petitioner
Versus Geeta Devi & Ors. …… Respondents
Coram
The Hon’ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner : Mr. Romesh Verma, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Sumit Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J
After arguing the matter for a considerable period of
time, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the present petition. Prayer allowed. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge
10th April 2022 (Rohit)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Manoj Kumar
Geeta Devi & Ors.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
