The petitioner's counsel submitted that the impugned order was complied with. Consequently, no further orders were required, and the petition was closed and disposed of.
No further orders/directions; petition closed and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Krishan Chand vs. Dr. Narinder Kumar Dhiman and anr.
COPC No. 296 of 2022
11.08.2023 Present: Mr. Vijay Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Rahul Thakur, Mr. Gautam Sood & Ms. Priyanka Chauhan, Dy. Advocate Generals for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has fairly
submitted that the order has been complied with.
In view of his statement no further orders/
directions are required to be passed in the petition. The same is accordingly closed and disposed of.
(Satyen Vaidya) Judge
11th August,2023 (gaurav)
Krishan Chand
Dr. Narinder Kumar Dhiman
anr.
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
